The authors theorize that in order to make sense of the complex
juxtaposition of sounds that makes up most music, listeners
segment the music into smaller, simpler units, and that they use
accent as one means of accomplishing this segmentation. The
authors further assert that accents may function in different
ways, depending on the specific musical elements that give rise
to the accent. For the purposes of their study, they define three
types of accent: metric accent, arising from regular
patterns of dynamic intensification; rhythmic grouping
accent, accruing to the notes immediately preceding and following
a long duration or pause; and melodic accent, arising from
melodic leap or change of direction. (It should be noted that the
authors' metric accent would be described by many
theorists as merely a "stress" accent. It is referred to here as
"metric" because in the melodies devised for this study these
accents are regularly recurring, but rhythmic grouping and
melodic accents are often regularly recurring as well, and the
authors ignore some other potential sources of meter in their
melodies, such as implied harmonic structure.) The primary
hypothesis is that melodies are most efficiently learned, and
therefore most effectively reproduced, when all three types of
accents coincide, since segmentation is easiest under these
conditions.
The authors devised four brief "themes," in which all three types
of accent coincide, and four "variations" on each of these
themes, in which one or all of the accent types are placed in
confict with the others. Groups of 5-, 7-, 9-, and 11-year-old
children and a group of university piano students were asked to
reproduce these melodies by tapping rhythms, singing, and/or
playing, and their performances were evaluated for accuracy. In
all of the groups of subjects, the rhythms of the themes were
reproduced no better than those of the variations, indicating
that the perception of the temporal structure of a melody is
relatively unaffected by accent synchrony. But the pitches of the
themes were in most cases reproduced significantly better than
those of the variaions, indicating that pitches are perceived
most readily when different types of accent reinforce each other.
The one exception to this involves the authors' "metric" accent,
the accent arising from dynamic stress, whose displacement from
other types of accent seems to have little effect on the
perception of the pitch structure.